Characterizing Climate Regime Changes from Parallel Climate Model (PCM) Predictions

December 3, 2003

Forrest M. Hoffman, William W. Hargrove, David J. Erickson III, Robert J. Oglesby


Contents


This analysis uses Parallel Climate Model (PCM) output in an attempt to understand how land surface conditions affecting terrestrial ecology might change based on model predictions. Three monthly output fields from five 100 year Business-As-Usual (BAU) PCM runs (for years 2000 through 2098) were chosen for inclusion in a cluster analysis. The three fields are surface temperature [K], precipitation [kg m-2 s-1], and soil moisture [volume fraction] (LSM root zone volumetric soil water). Ocean and sea ice cells were removed prior to clustering so only the 2,796 land cells (out of a total of 8,192 cells at T42 resolution) were included.

Individual PCM Run Analyses

Initially, each of the five BAU runs was clustered independently into 32 regimes. Table 1 contains visualization products resulting from all five cluster analyses. The Map Animations, available in random or similarity colors, show which regime each land cell occupies every month for the entire 100 year period. In addition, a histogram of climate regime or cluster occupancy is shown next to the map for each month. The Regime Evolution graphs, also available in random or similarity colors, show how climate regimes grow or shrink in spatial area over the 100 year simulation period. These curves represent five-year running averages of regime (or climate state) occupancy globally. Regimes with low variance, i.e., those having an occupancy change of <100 grid cells, have been removed from these graphs.

The Climate Phase Space animations show where each climate regime, represented by a small cube, is located in the three-dimensional climate phase space for each BAU run. These are the cluster centroids for each state or climate regime. The Regime Definition tables contain the temperature, precipitation, and soil moisture values for these climate regimes. Finally, two additional animations included in Table 1 show cliamte regime occupancy for a single grid cell from the model output.

The grid cell of interest is located in the Middle East. The Phase Trajectory animation shows how that spatial location (represented by a "spider") moves among climate states as model time progresses. The transitions between favored states are displayed as a black line segments which form a "web." As these transitions are repeatedly traversed, the segments get thicker so that favored transitions among climate states can be observed.

In the Climate Manifold animation, the soil moisture variable on the x-axis has been droped so that time can be shown on this axis. The animations show all the transitions among states for this single point on the globe drawn out through time so that it forms a coil or manifold. Rare transitions to extreme states can be easily seen in this visualization.

Warning: The movies below are large animated GIF files. These animations are best viewed using a browser which streams the images instead of attempting to load the entire file into memory at once. Netscape 4.x will correctly stream these animations, but other browsers may not.

Table 1: Individual BAU Run Analysis Products with 32 Climate Regimes
Run Number Map Animation Regime Evolution Climate
Phase Space
Regime Definitions Middle East
Random Colors Similarity Colors Random Colors Similarity Colors Phase Trajectory Climate Manifold
B05.12 Movie Movie Graph Graph Movie Table Movie Movie
B05.15 Movie Movie Graph Graph Movie Table Movie Movie
B05.18 Movie Movie Graph Graph Movie Table Movie Movie
B06.06 Movie Movie Graph Graph Movie Table Movie Movie
B06.09 Movie Movie Graph Graph Movie Table Movie Movie

The Regime Evolution graphs in Table 1 show regime occupancy changes on a global basis. The climate changes in some land areas may compensate for climate changes in other land areas globally causing a low overall regime variance through time. As a result, similar evolution curves were produced for each continent. For these graphs, shown in Table 2, only curves which exhibited more than a 1% change in continental spatial area are included. This thresholding eliminates curves for regimes which do not undergo a significant change in spatial area.

Table 2: Individual BAU Run Analysis
Regime Evolution by Continent (Random Colors)
Run Number Africa Antarctica Australia Eurasia Greenland North America South America
B05.12 Graph Graph Graph Graph Graph Graph Graph
B05.15 Graph Graph Graph Graph Graph Graph Graph
B05.18 Graph Graph Graph Graph Graph Graph Graph
B06.06 Graph Graph Graph Graph Graph Graph Graph
B06.09 Graph Graph Graph Graph Graph Graph Graph

Ensemble Cluster Analysis

In order to compare predictions from the different model runs, climate regimes common to all model runs must be computed. By including all five BAU runs (for a total of 500 years) in a single clustering analysis, we obtain a single common set of climate regimes or states. These common states serves as a basis for head-to-head comparison of the individual model runs. This clustering contained over 16M data points. These points have been plotted in an animation of the three-dimensional climate phase space colored by run number (see Movie).

Table 3: Products from Ensemble Cluster Analysis with 32 Climate Regimes
Run Number Map Animation Regime Evolution Common Climate
Phase Space
Common Regime Definitions Middle East
Random Colors Similarity Colors Random Colors Similarity Colors Phase Trajectory Climate Manifold
B05.12 Movie Movie Graph Graph Movie Table Movie Movie
B05.15 Movie Movie Graph Graph Movie Movie
B05.18 Movie Movie Graph Graph Movie Movie
B06.06 Movie Movie Graph Graph Movie Movie
B06.09 Movie Movie Graph Graph Movie Movie

Since all the model results are displayed with respect to a common set of climate regimes, they can be easily compared. Moreover, the phase trajectories from all five model runs can be plotted together in a single animation to more-easily discern when model predictions diverge and converge (see Movie).

In addition to the global Regime Evolution graphs above, similar evolution curves were produced for each continent. For these graphs, shown in Table 4, only curves which exhibited more than a 1% change in continental spatial area are included. This thresholding eliminates curves for regimes which do not undergo a significant change in spatial area.

Table 4: Ensemble BAU Run Analysis
Regime Evolution by Continent (Random Colors)
Run Number Africa Antarctica Australia Eurasia Greenland North America South America
B05.12 Graph Graph Graph Graph Graph Graph Graph
B05.15 Graph Graph Graph Graph Graph Graph Graph
B05.18 Graph Graph Graph Graph Graph Graph Graph
B06.06 Graph Graph Graph Graph Graph Graph Graph
B06.09 Graph Graph Graph Graph Graph Graph Graph

Ensemble Average Cluster Analysis

Table 5: Ensemble Average BAU Analysis Products with 32 Climate Regimes
Run Number Map Animation Regime Evolution Climate
Phase Space
Regime Definitions Middle East
Random Colors Similarity Colors Random Colors Similarity Colors Phase Trajectory Climate Manifold
Ensemble Average Movie Movie Graph Graph Movie
Same Common Climate Regimes as in Ensemble Cluster Analysis
Table
Same Common Climate Regimes as in Ensemble Cluster Analysis
Movie Movie

A second map animation was generated showing only the regimes which undergo a significant spatial change globally (see Movie). This animation makes it easy to see where and when these environmental conditions occur.

In addition to the global Regime Evolution graph above, similar evolution curves were produced for each continent. For these graphs, shown in Table 6, only curves which exhibited more than a 1% change in continental spatial area are included. This thresholding eliminates curves for regimes which do not undergo a significant change in spatial area.

Table 6: Ensemble Average BAU Analysis
Regime Evolution by Continent (Random Colors)
Run Number Africa Antarctica Australia Eurasia Greenland North America South America
Ensemble Average Graph Graph Graph Graph Graph Graph Graph

Time Interval Average of the Ensemble Average

Table 7: Ten Year Seasonal Average of the Ensemble Average BAU Model Predictions
Months Present
(2001-2010)
Future
(2089-2098)
Difference Maps
Stop-Light Colors
Random Colors Similarity Colors Random Colors Similarity Colors Present Map Future Map
December, January, February (DJF) Map Map Map Map Map Map
June, July, August (JJA) Map Map Map Map Map Map

Time Series Comparison Methodology

Table 8: Clustering Methods for Comparison of Time Series Data
Clustering Method Single Time Series Multiple Time Series (Ensemble) Ensemble Average Time Series
Normal Clustering normal classification and
single time series centroids
ensemble classifications and
ensemble centroids
normal classification and
ensemble average centroids
One-pass Clustering
with
single time series centroids
normal classification¹ ² classifications comparable to
single time series classification³
classification comparable to
single time series classification³
One-pass Clustering
with
ensemble centroids
classification comparable to
ensemble classifications² ³
ensemble classifications¹ classification comparable to
ensemble classifications
³
One-pass Clustering
with
ensemble average centroids
classification comparable to
ensemble average classification² ³
classifications comparable to
ensemble average classification³
normal classification¹
¹ Obtained automatically from normal clustering (first row)
² Contained at right if the ensemble contains the single time series
³ Data normalization requires that the input data be transformed to the phase space of the data used to generate the centroids
Note: Ensemble average centroids are generally more tightly confined within the populated region of phase space than centroids generated from the complete ensemble.

Table 9: Clustering Methods for Comparison of Time Interval Averages with Time Series Data
Clustering Method Time Interval Average of
Single Time Series
Single Time Interval Averages of
Multiple Time Series (Ensemble)
Time Interval Average of
Ensemble Average Time Series
Normal Clustering n = 1 time interval classifications and
time interval centroids
n = 1
One-pass Clustering
with
single time series centroids
classification comparable to
normal classification³
classifications comparable to
single time series classification³
classification comparable to
single time series classification³
One-pass Clustering
with
ensemble centroids
classification comparable to
ensemble classifications³
classifications comparable to
ensemble classifications³
classification comparable to
ensemble classifications
³
One-pass Clustering
with
ensemble average centroids
classification comparable to
ensemble average classification³
classifications comparable to
ensemble average classification³
classification comparable to
normal classification³
³ Data normalization requires that the input data be transformed to the phase space of the data used to generate the centroids

This Site vi powered For assistance or additional information, contact Forrest Hoffman (forrest@climatemodeling.org)
Last Modified: Wednesday, 28-Mar-2007 18:29:21 EDT
Visited [an error occurred while processing this directive] times
Warnings and Disclaimers